If this system fails, the game becomes a frustrating, unplayable mess that bleeds players instantly.
While this conspiracy theory is widespread, the reality is much more mundane and focused entirely on mathematical fairness.
The Elo System Adapted
Most modern strategy games utilize a modified version of the Elo rating system, originally designed for professional chess.
When you go on a massive winning streak, your trophy count inflates, and the algorithm begins matching you against significantly better players.
- If you are hovering around 50%, you are in the correct arena for your skill level.
- Because there are fewer Grandmasters, the algorithm struggles to find perfect matches.
- Losing streaks are also self-correcting.
The Free-to-Play Dilemma
The standard Elo system works perfectly for chess because all pieces are equal, but tower rush games feature upgradeable cards.
However, if no such player is available, the algorithm will prioritize queue speed over level fairness, resulting in those frustrating, mismatched games.
| Matchmaking Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| Elo Rating | Absolute Highest Priority |
| King Level / Card Levels | The system tries to match levels, but will abandon this check if the queue takes longer than 10 seconds |
Maintaining Competitive Integrity
Because the ladder algorithm must balance queue times against fairness, it will never be perfectly balanced.
When levels are equalized, the matchmaking system shines, ensuring that the better player almost always wins.
